19 April 2016
Why Justice for Animals Is the Social Movement of Our Time
In "Why Justice for Animals Is the Social Movement of Our Time," recently published in Psychology Today, Dr. Ferdowsian argues that human and animal rights are not mutually exclusive. Quite the contrary, they can be mutually reinforcing because "there is common ground occupied by those working on behalf of people and animals—both because of the shared potential for suffering and because many solutions to successfully combat domination, violence, and abuse are universal."
01 April 2016
Statistics
02 March 2016
Statistics
01 March 2016
02 February 2016
Statistics
01 February 2016
25 January 2016
Mylan Engel Jr and Kathie Jenni on Philosophy
Philosophy differs from many intellectual disciplines in that it is fundamentally a normative discipline. Unlike those disciplines whose primary aim is to describe various phenomena, philosophy aims to evaluate our views, attitudes, and behavior. At the societal level, philosophy seeks to identify and critically evaluate the cultural assumptions and dogmas of the day, exposing indefensible assumptions as mere prejudice. At the personal level, philosophy challenges us as individuals to assess whether our own beliefs, attitudes, and practices are justifiable, with an eye toward abandoning or revising those beliefs and practices found to be unjustifiable.
As a result, philosophical inquiry often proves profoundly valuable both for society and for the individual. Principal among philosophy's contributions to society is its power to reform: Most of the great social reform movements of the modern era have grown out of philosophical challenges to the status quo. At the personal level, philosophical self-examination helps us to live authentic, meaningful lives. By subjecting our beliefs, attitudes, and practices to critical scrutiny, we learn what our most deeply held values are—an essential first step toward acting in accordance with those values. When philosophy helps us to live our lives in conformity with our most deeply held values, it becomes a transformative experience.
(Mylan Engel Jr and Kathie Jenni, The Philosophy of Animal Rights: A Brief Introduction for Students and Teachers [New York: Lantern Books, 2010], 7 [italics in original])
Note from KBJ: I reject this conception of philosophy. To quote Peter Winch, "philosophy can no more show a man what he should attach importance to than geometry can show a man where he should stand." The purpose of philosophy is to clarify concepts. This includes showing people the implications of what they already believe.
01 January 2016
Statistics
01 December 2015
Statistics
28 November 2015
Anniversary
01 November 2015
Statistics
01 October 2015
Statistics
01 September 2015
Statistics
17 August 2015
Abolitionism Versus Meliorism
05 August 2015
Statistics
24 July 2015
Beliefs About Animal Rights
Note from KBJ: This post is by Mylan Engel.
01 July 2015
Statistics
01 June 2015
Statistics
01 May 2015
Statistics
01 April 2015
Statistics
01 March 2015
Statistics
01 February 2015
Statistics
07 January 2015
From Today's New York Times
As Mark Bittman rightly notes, California’s new farm animal welfare law presages what is coming for all farm animal industries nationally (“Hens, Unbound,” column, Jan. 1).
The tiny cages and crates that confine about 90 percent of laying hens and more than 80 percent of gestating sows are both physically and mentally tormenting for the animals involved.
Physically, the muscles and the bones of the animals atrophy from lack of use. Mentally, they go insane from boredom and stress, just as our dogs or cats would if they were kept in tiny crates or carriers for their entire lives.
There is no difference between cruelty to a pig or a dog or a hen or a cat, and so the sooner we relegate these awful devices to the dustbin of history, the better.
BRUCE G. FRIEDRICH
Washington, Jan. 1, 2015
The writer is director of advocacy and policy for Farm Sanctuary, a national farm animal protection group.
01 January 2015
Statistics
01 December 2014
Statistics
28 November 2014
Anniversary
01 November 2014
Statistics
01 October 2014
Statistics
01 September 2014
Statistics
06 August 2014
Statistics
01 July 2014
Statistics
20 June 2014
From Today's New York Times
Once again people associated with the animal rights group PETA (letter, June 19) have tried to disparage the commitment circuses have for animal care and conservation. Despite the claims made in the letter, circuses like Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey are dedicated to providing the very best of care for all our animals, especially the Asian elephant. Rather than adopt stringent United States animal care standards, which Ringling Bros. fully supports, officials in Mexico City unnecessarily banned circuses with animals.
In the United States, 10 million fans a year see a Ringling Bros. performance, and their No. 1 reason for coming is our animals. Rather than rely on PETA’s rhetoric, circus fans should come and see for themselves how all our animals are thriving at the Greatest Show on Earth.
STEPHEN PAYNE
Vienna, Va., June 19, 2014
The writer is vice president, corporate communications, for Feld Entertainment, parent company of Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey.
18 June 2014
From Today's New York Times
Re “Worry Under the Big Top as Mexico City Moves to Ban Circus Animals” (news article, June 15):
Mexico City joins the growing list of cities that have banned the exploitation of animals in circuses. Several countries, including Austria, Bolivia, Colombia, Greece, Peru, Britain and Paraguay, have already imposed or approved bans. Why is the United States lagging so far behind?
Our elected officials must recognize that beating elephants with bullhooks—heavy batons with a sharp metal hook on the end that can tear elephants’ skin—and whipping tigers until they cringe and cower, are ethically indefensible.
When not performing, animals spend most of their lives caged or chained in tractor-trailers and railroad boxcars while traveling from city to city. They have none of what makes their lives worth living: roaming freely, controlling territory, socializing and simple autonomy.
The trend is undeniable: The days of hauling and hurting animals in the name of entertainment are quickly coming to an end.
JENNIFER O’CONNOR
Staff Writer, PETA Foundation
Norfolk, Va., June 16, 2014
01 June 2014
Statistics
01 May 2014
Statistics
01 April 2014
Statistics
11 March 2014
06 March 2014
From Today's New York Times
Re “They’re Going to Wish They All Could Be California Hens” (front page, March 4):
While the conditions in California’s colony cages are certainly better than those of the barren battery cages used for 90 percent of egg-laying hens in this country, they still involve cramming 60 animals into a wire cage, each bird with just 116 square inches in which to live her entire life
At Farm Sanctuary, we spend our lives with hens, and we can attest that chickens are individuals with needs and personalities, just like the dogs and cats most readers will know a bit better. It is no more acceptable to confine 60 hens for their entire lives in a cage that you report is “about the size of a Ford F-150 pickup truck’s flatbed” than it would be to treat 60 cats similarly.
Compassionate consumers can take a stand against this cruelty by choosing vegan options.
BRUCE FRIEDRICH
Senior Policy Director
Farm Sanctuary
Washington, March 4, 2014
To the Editor:
The humane laws for hens in California that provide them more space in which to live should be countrywide. Chickens deserve to live humanely. That’s the least farmers can do.
People seem to lose sight of the fact that these are sentient animals, not food machines! The same goes for pigs and cattle that are exploited and forced to live in substandard conditions.
Congratulations to California for being so compassionate and leading the way.
ELAINE SLOAN
New York, March 4, 2014
01 March 2014
Statistics
01 February 2014
Statistics
16 January 2014
According Animals Dignity
01 January 2014
Statistics
11 December 2013
Henry S. Salt (1851-1939) on the Golden Rule
01 December 2013
Statistics
28 November 2013
Ten Years Gone
24 November 2013
Henry S. Salt (1851-1939) on Animal Rights
01 November 2013
Statistics
01 October 2013
Statistics
03 September 2013
Kristof
- Kristof says that "SeaWorld [marine park] denies the claims [of mistreatment], which isn't surprising since it earns millions [of dollars] from orcas." This is cynicism. Kristof should address SeaWorld's argument, not question its motives. How would he like it if his readers questioned (or speculated about) his motives? (For example: Does Kristof own stock in a rival company?) Charity requires that good (or at least benign) motives be imputed to arguers. Cynicism is the imputation of bad motives. Cynicism is not argumentation; it is the evasion of argumentation.
- Kristof writes: "The juxtaposition of the two reviews made me wonder: Some day, will our descendants be mystified by how good and decent people in the early 21st century—that's us—could have been so oblivious to the unethical treatment of animals?" Good question! I would replace "animals" with "fetuses."
- Kristof writes, by way of apology for his "hypocrisy," that he eats meat ("albeit with misgivings") and has "no compunctions about using mousetraps." Eating meat and using mousetraps are as different (morally speaking) as night and day. Using a mousetrap can be justified by defense of self or property (though there are more humane ways of getting rid of pests). Eating meat cannot be so justified. Nobody needs to eat meat in order to survive or flourish. This shows that Kristof has not given much serious thought to the topic of the moral status of animals. He knows just enough about the topic to be dangerous (since he has a large audience).


.jpg)
